Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 9;5:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.008

Table 2.

Cutpoints for barriers to increasing physical activity; Chicago, Illinois.

Variable M (SD) Range Cutpointa Cases above/below cutpoint
n (%)
Demographic
 Children in household Y/N Y 94 (36.5)
 Employed Y/N Y 193 (74.2)
 Number of hardships 0.66 (0.82) 0–2 ≥ 2 56 (22.0)
Physical health
 General health 3.25 (0.80) 1–5 < 3 34 (13.2)
 Pain 9.26 (5.62) 4–34 ≥ 11 82 (32.4)
 BMI (kg/m2) 35.30 (7.51) 21–61 ≥ 40 59 (22.7)
Psychological health
 Depression 8.78 (7.12) 0–38 ≥ 16 40 (15.4)
Neighborhood characteristics
 Perceived walkability 3.08 (0.42) 1.6–3.9 ≤ 2.8 64 (24.8)
 Assault/battery rate 649.30 (519.03) 0–2564 ≥ 1000 69 (26.8)
Perceived barriers to PA
 Perceived barriers for PA 22.62 (9.74) 0–55 ≥ 29 68 (26.4)
Social support
 Support from family 2.10 (1.08) 1–5 ≤ 1.5 95 (37.1)
 Support from friends 2.16 (1.06) 1–5 ≤ 1.5 85 (34.0)
a

Variables were dichotomized as indicated such that a value of one represented a barrier to adherence in increasing physical activity (i.e., a lower likelihood of increasing PA).