Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Sep 28;136:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.09.019

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Unconditioned stimulus (UCS) expectancy and conditioned skin conductance response (SCR). UCS expectancy and conditioned SCR were greater during temporal conditioning (i.e., fixed interval UCS) than the control (i.e., random interval UCS) procedure. Error bars reflect the standard error of the mean. Asterisk indicates a significant difference.