Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1942–1953. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1068-8

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Correlations between the size of local attraction in the eye-tracking task (looks to the adjective competitor in the experimental and control conditions when the verb was constraining) and two measures in the Fish-Flanker task. The upper panel shows the correlation with the size of the Flanker effect (difference in RTs in the congruent and incongruent conditions for the go trials). The lower panel shows the correlation between with the number of commission errors on the no-go trials.