Table 3.

Results of comparing the magnitude of local attraction (looks to the adjective competitor in the experimental minus control condition) when the verb is constraining and when it is not (trial type 1–2 vs. trial type 3–4).

Fixed effects
	coefficient	SE	t	p-value
intercept	0.100	0.018	5.45	<0.001
linear term	−0.27	0.069	−4.00	<0.001
quadratic term	0.017	0.059	0.289	0.776
cubic term	−0.067	0.025	−2.66	0.012
condition*intercept	0.087	0.023	3.74	<0.001
condition*linear term	0.210	0.080	2.64	0.009
condition*quadratic term	−0.272	0.082	−3.307	0.001
verb*intercept	−0.020	0.023	−0.876	0.383
verb*linear term	0.129	0.080	1.621	0.108
verb*quadratic term	−0.059	0.082	−0.717	0.475
condition*verb*intercept	−0.069	0.033	−2.096	0.038
condition*verb*linear term	−0.022	0.113	−0.192	0.848
condition*verb*quadratic term	0.277	0.117	2.37	0.019
Random effects
subject intercept	Variance
polynomial’s intercept	0.002
linear term	0.044
quadratic term	0.001
cubic term	0.005
subject|condition*verb slope	Variance
polynomial’s intercept	0.009
linear term	0.124
quadratic term	0.112
cubic term	0.056