Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2016 Jun 8;61:142–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.06.008

Appendix B.

Stepwise Models of Hate Crime Incidence to Determine the Number of Lags and Leads (estimates represent relationship per one million individuals, standard errors in brackets)1

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
Spatial Lag 0.3 0.32 0.3 0.31 0.31
[0.2] [0.2] [0.2] [0.19] [0.19]
Const. amend. 0.03 0.08 0.15 0.02
[0.37] [0.38] [0.37] [0.34]
Const. amend. t-1 −0.12 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.19
[0.4] [0.35] [0.35] [0.35] [0.3]
Const. amend. t-2 0.49
[0.35]
Const. amend. t+1 −0.37 −0.4 −0.25
[0.28] [0.28] [0.24]
Const. amend. t+2 0.41 0.4
[0.26] [0.25]
Partner. reco. 0.65 0.62 0.8 0.8 a 0.81 a
[0.91] [0.89] [0.87] [0.87] [0.84]
Partner. reco. t-1 0.66 0.83 0.81 0.8 a 0.83 a
[1.1] [1.09] [1.1] [1.1] [1.09]
Partner. reco. t-2 1.16 0.97 1 1.05 a 1.01 a
[1.19] [1.06] [1.05] [1.05] [1.05]
Partner. reco. t+1 0.19 0.31
[0.7] [0.65]
Partner. reco. t+2 0.06
[0.68]
Hate crime −0.01 0.09 −0.1
[0.51] [0.51] [0.47]
Hate crime t-1 −0.78 −0.89* −0.81 −0.92* −0.91*
[0.48] [0.45] [0.44] [0.38] [0.38]
Hate crime t-2 −0.17
[0.46]
Hate crime t+1 −0.42 −0.54
[0.6] [0.55]
Hate crime t+2 −0.07
[1.08]
Emp. Discrim. −1.01 −1.06 −1.1 a −1.09 b −1.11 b
[0.86] [0.86] [0.77] [0.77] [0.76]
Emp. Discrim. t-1 −0.6 −0.88 −0.81 a −0.8 b −0.81 b
[0.85] [0.73] [0.74] [0.74] [0.73]
Emp. Discrim. t-2 −0.4
[0.72]
Emp. Discrim. t+1 0.04 0.06
[0.93] [0.81]
Emp. Discrim. t+2 0.15
[0.89]
Violent crime inc −1161.5 −1118.3* −1096.4 −1094.5 −1118
[594.4] [562.3] [566.5] [561.2] [570.8]
Property crime inc −57.4 −64.9 −60.1 −63 −63.9
[47.4] [45.8] [46.1] [45.5] [44.6]
Citizen ideology 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
[0.02] [0.02] [0.02] [0.02] [0.02]
Unemployment −0.06 −0.06 −0.06 −0.06 −0.07
[0.09] [0.08] [0.08] [0.08] [0.08]
Democratic governor 0.3 0.32 0.35 0.3 0.33
[0.52] [0.55] [0.48] [0.52] [0.52]
% Democratic legisl. 0.8 0.99 1.66 1.21 1.44
[2.06] [2.01] [1.9] [1.89] [1.99]
Government ideology 0 −0.01 −0.01 0 −0.01
[0.02] [0.02] [0.02] [0.02] [0.02]
Racial hate crime 12857*** 128043*** 129172*** 128788*** 128679***
[24657] [24221] [24717] [24580] [24587]
Religion hate crime 145979 155788 150616 153608 153270
[85350] [84381] [84311] [83620] [83652]
Disability hate crime 47976 44828 40149 43725 53361
[220981] [222970] [225289] [224551] [224167]
Constant 7.14* 7.24* 6.74* 6.87* 7.05*
[3.22] [3.01] [3.02] [2.94] [2.94]
N 637 637 637 637 637
Multiple Imputation x x x x x
1

Spatial lag has a one-to-one relationship (not one-to-one million).

a–b

Jointly statistically significant (Wald test)

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001