Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Sep 26;45:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.09.003

Table 2.

Registry Linkages by Screening Center

Center (location) Subjects included in current analysis # sent to home state registry (ies) Matches from home state registry(ies)1 # sent to non-home state registries 2 Matches from non-home registries 1 % of all matches that were from home state registry (ies)
N N N(N per 100 sent ) N N(N per 100 sent)
Univ of Colorado (Denver, CO) 11,368 11,357 2043 (18.0) 12545 55 (0.4) 97.4
Georgetown Univ (Washington, DC) 8034 8027 1094 (13.6) 4658 43 (0.9) 96.2
Pacific Health (Honolulu, HI) 10657 10640 1871 (17.6) 2746 72 (2.6) 96.3
Henry Ford (Detroit, MI) 23980 23974 3835 (16.0) 23468 81 (0.3) 97.9
Univ of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA) 15018 14719 2491 (16.9) 26686 31 (0.1) 98.7
Univ of Utah (Salt Lake City, UT & Boise, ID) 11026 11022 1903 (17.3) 23327 47 (0.2) 97.6
1

Matches are per cancer type, not per subject. A subject could have more than one match if they had diagnoses of more than one cancer type.

2

Subjects sent to multiple non-home state registries are counted multiple times (one for each registry sent to). Non-home state registries were AZ, CA, NV, OH, and TX and any other registry not the home-state registry for the given center. Note subjects at Georgetown and University of Utah had multiple home state registries (DC/MD/VA & UT/ID, respectively), but number sent reflects number sent to at least one home state registry (i.e., these are not counted multiple times for multiple home-state registries).