Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016 May 27;20(5):1225–1231. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2574201

TABLE I.

Performance Comparison Based on the Optimal Number of Features Selected in the TU Cohort

TU Cohort Glycomic Proteomic Integrated
(P & G)
Accuracy 0.77 0.84 0.87

Sensitivity 0.82 0.83 0.90

Specificity 0.75 0.84 0.85

AUC
(95% CI)
0.87
(0.78, 0.93)
0.93
(0.83, 0.97)
0.92
(0.81, 0.97)

Optimal
Number of
Features
29/82 15/101 9/183

Selected
Featuresb
[25000] [43000]a P01024a
[53111]a [34100]a P02743
[63402]a [43202]a,c P02750
[53313] [53000]a P02753a P02743
[53323] [33101] P02763 P02763
[34110] [63403]a P03952 P05160
[53311]c [53311]c P04004a P06727
[43110]a [53010] P05160 P0C0L4
[63413]a [53302]a P06727 P22891a
[53411] [34101] P0C0L4 P35858
[63423] [63404]a P13598a [43000]a
[53312] [29000] P13796 [26000]
[53101]a [73514] P22891a
[53201] [43202]a,c P27918
[2 10 000] P35858
a

Significant (p value ≤ 0.05) in univariate statistical analysis

b

N-glycans are characterized by GlcNAc, mannose, galactose, fucose, and NeuNAc, and proteins are indicated by Uniprot IDs

c

Isomers with different retention times

The results of best performing methods are marked in bold.