Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 16;89(1066):20160443. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160443

Table A1.

Dose and coverage differences between segmentation cone beam CT (sCBCT) plans and planning CT plan in percentage for the planning target volume (PTV), rectum and bladder using pencil beam (PB), collapsed cone (CC) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms

Scan sCBCTman
sCBCTauto
PB CC MC PB CC MC
PTV Dmax −0.83 −0.56 3.42 −1.38 −1.40 0.00
Dmean −1.54 −1.00 −0.60 −1.97 −1.60 −1.20
Dmin −3.69 −0.32 0.00 −4.31 −0.96 −4.29
Rectum Dmax −1.98 −2.28 −2.26 −1.98 −2.56 −2.54
Dmean −2.57 −2.27 −2.40 −2.69 −2.56 −2.66
Dmin 8.69 8.00 31.57 8.69 8.00 31.57
Bladder Dmax −1.11 −1.13 0.57 −1.66 −1.13 0.85
Dmean −48.60 −48.84 −47.15 −49.04 −49.17 −47.414
Dmin −43.47 −52.17 −47.05 −43.47 −52.17 −47.05

Dmax, maximum dose; Dmean, mean dose; Dmin, minimum dose; sCBCTauto, sCBCT using the automated multilevel threshold; sCBCTman, sCBCT using the manual multilevel threshold.