Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 3;89(1067):20151033. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20151033

Table 5.

Comparison of brain volumes between patients with Cockayne syndrome (CS) and controls (left), and between CS subtypes (right)

Brain volume CS patients Controls p-value CS2 + COFS CS1 + CS3 p-value
WBV (mm3) 501324.86 ± 144376 1154959.7 ± 132345.36 p < 0.001
Percentage WBV reduction: 57.06 ± 9.54%
353792.2 ± 144376.42 583287.44 ± 116385.8 p < 0.001
Percentage WBV reduction relative to corresponding controls: CS1 + CS3: 52.4 ± 7% CS2 + COFS: 65.2 ± 9%
ITV (mm3) 45366.43 ± 19.222.98 144049.42 ± 15126.48 p = 2905e−11
Percentage PFV reduction: 68.68 ± 11.9%
31020 ± 19223 53336 ± 18920 p = 0.00876
STV (mm3) 455958.43 ± 128324.65 1010910.3 ± 120963.38 p = 1.436e−11
Percentage STV reduction: 52.2 ± 9.1%
322772 ± 153112.86 529950.89 ± 102618.7 p = 0.0002417
ITV/WBV 8.9 ± 1.9% 12.6 ± 0.9% p < 0.001 9.1 ± 2.2% 8.7 ± 1.7% p = 0.7

COFS, cerebro-oculo-facio-skeletal syndrome; ITV, infratentorial volume; STV, supratentorial volume; WBV, whole-brain volume.

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. p value <0.05 was considered significant.