Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 23;89(1064):20160249. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160249

Table 1.

The evaluation order of the six observers

Observer (years of experience) Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2 Evaluation 3
1 (12) Standard Inverted Fast-flicking
2 (30) Inverted Fast-flicking Standard
3 (7) Fast-flicking Standard Inverted
4 (32) Standard Fast-flicking Inverted
5 (14) Fast-flicking Inverted Standard
6 (5) Inverted Standard Fast-flicking

Images were displayed in a different randomized order for each of the 18 image evaluations.