Skip to main content
editorial
. 2016 Nov 28;22(44):9661–9673. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9661

Table 1.

Summary of studies concerning radiofrequency ablation

Authors Number of patients Lesion type Location Treatment type Approach Needle Mean treatment duration Conclusion
D’Onofrio et al[8] 18 Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Head Radiofrequency ablation Percutaneous with US 17 G 3 min and 13 s High success rate, with 40% of cases showing CA 19.9 reduction
Carrafiello et al[26] 1 Pancreatic metastases from renal cell Body-tail Radiofrequency ablation Percutaneous with CT 19 G 8 min and 35 s RFA is feasible for
metastatic lesions at body-tail
Limmer et al[27] 1 Insulinoma Body-tail Radiofrequency ablation Percutaneous with CT 16 G 18 min RFA proved to be a clinically successful
procedure
Wu et al[28] 1 Gastrinoma Tail Radiofrequency ablation Percutaneous transplenic with CT - - Percutaneous transplenic RFA is feasible
Singh et al[29] 11 Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - Radiofrequency ablation 1 percutaneous with CT + 10 laparoscopic - - RFA is a safe and feasible technique of tumor cytoreduction
Rossi et al[30] 8 Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors Head and body-tail Radiofrequency ablation Percutaneous with CT 17 and 19 G 9 min RFA is a feasible, safe, and effective option

US: Ultrasound; CT: Computed tomography; RFA: Radiofrequency ablation.