Table 1.
Authors | Number of patients | Lesion type | Location | Treatment type | Approach | Needle | Mean treatment duration | Conclusion |
D’Onofrio et al[8] | 18 | Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | Head | Radiofrequency ablation | Percutaneous with US | 17 G | 3 min and 13 s | High success rate, with 40% of cases showing CA 19.9 reduction |
Carrafiello et al[26] | 1 | Pancreatic metastases from renal cell | Body-tail | Radiofrequency ablation | Percutaneous with CT | 19 G | 8 min and 35 s | RFA is feasible for |
metastatic lesions at body-tail | ||||||||
Limmer et al[27] | 1 | Insulinoma | Body-tail | Radiofrequency ablation | Percutaneous with CT | 16 G | 18 min | RFA proved to be a clinically successful |
procedure | ||||||||
Wu et al[28] | 1 | Gastrinoma | Tail | Radiofrequency ablation | Percutaneous transplenic with CT | - | - | Percutaneous transplenic RFA is feasible |
Singh et al[29] | 11 | Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | - | Radiofrequency ablation | 1 percutaneous with CT + 10 laparoscopic | - | - | RFA is a safe and feasible technique of tumor cytoreduction |
Rossi et al[30] | 8 | Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors | Head and body-tail | Radiofrequency ablation | Percutaneous with CT | 17 and 19 G | 9 min | RFA is a feasible, safe, and effective option |
US: Ultrasound; CT: Computed tomography; RFA: Radiofrequency ablation.