Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 28.
Published in final edited form as: Science. 2015 Jan 30;347(6221):555–558. doi: 10.1126/science.1260590

Fig. 3. Structural comparison of WTand A139T RsTSPO.

Fig. 3

Monomers of the WT (wheat) and A139T (green) are overlaid. (A) Overall structural alignment that highlights the degree and direction (arrows) of conformation change from WT to A139T for TM-II and TM-V. (B) Top view of the monomer, highlighting the side-chain rearrangements in sticks. Residue 139 is colored in blue; the CRAC site is colored in pink with two of three proposed critical residues (L142 and F144) highlighted in magenta. The prime symbol designates the mutant position. (C) Close-up side view of the potential ligand binding cavity, which reveals major differences in the conformations of LP1, TM-II, and TM-V between the WTand mutant proteins (fig. S7). The dotted yellow line denotes the location of unresolved LP1 in the WT structure (residues 29 to 40).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure