Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov 19;105(2):444–450. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.032

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of fresh elective single ETs (eSET) and fresh elective double ETs (DET) among patients younger than 35 years of age with no prior ART cycles who cryopreserved at least one embryo in 2012.

eSET (n = 4,129) DET (n = 10,001)
Characteristic N % N % P value
Age (y)   .63
 ≤30 1,872 45.3 4,602 46.0
 31–32 1,168 28.3 2,743 27.4
 33–34 1,089 26.4 2,656 26.6
Gravidity   .39
 0 2,657 64.5 6,363 63.8
 1 839 20.4 1,990 20.0
 ≥2 623 15.1 1,618 16.2
Parity   .07
 0 3,394 82.5 8,406 84.4
 1 546 13.3 1,123 11.3
 ≥2 174 4.2 430 4.3
Racea <.001
 Non-Hispanic white 2,110 73.1 5,007 73.0
 Non-Hispanic black 160 5.5 452 6.6
 Asian/Pacific Islander 429 14.9 730 10.6
 Hispanic 182 6.3 661 9.6
 Other 5 0.2 14 0.2
Body mass index (BMI)a <.001
 <18.5 133 3.8 252 3.1
 18.5–24.9 2,030 58.6 4,450 55.0
 25–29.9 800 23.1 1,951 24.1
 ≥30 500 14.4 1,442 17.8
ART diagnoses (not mutually exclusive)
 Female factor infertility
 Diminished ovarian reserve 178 4.3 641 6.4 <.001
 Endometriosis 365 8.8 1,217 12.2 <.001
 Ovulation disorders 986 23.9 2,264 22.6   .16
 Tubal factor 574 13.9 1,596 16.0   .02
 Uterine factor 178 4.3 362 3.6   .11
 Male factor infertility 1,586 38.4 4,183 41.8   .006
 Other reason for infertility 487 11.8 898 9.0 <.001
 Unexplained infertility 734 17.8 1,449 14.5 <.001
No. of oocytes retrieved <.001
 2–4 43 1.0 81 0.8
 5–9 486 11.8 1,472 14.7
 10–14 1,007 24.4 2,882 28.8
 15–19 1,102 26.7 2,629 26.3
 ≥20 1,491 36.1 2,937 29.4
Assisted hatching 539 13.1 2,391 23.9 <.001
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection 2,843 68.9 7,797 78.0 <.001
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis 245 5.9 326 3.3 <.001
Embryo stageb <.001
 Cleavage (day 2–3) 371 9.0 2,927 29.3
 Blastocyst (day 5–6) 3,721 90.1 6,862 68.6
No. of embryos cryopreserved <.001
 1–2 1,141 27.6 4,045 40.5
 3–5 1,654 40.1 3,640 36.4
 ≥6 1,334 32.3 2,316 23.2

Note: ART = assisted reproductive technology.

a

Race data were missing for 30% of the eSET group and 31% of the DET group. BMI data were missing for 16% of the eSET group and 19% of the DET group. Percentages and P values were calculated for the data available.

b

A small percentage of transfers occurred on days 1 and 4. Data not shown.