Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 14;5(4):417–452. doi: 10.1007/s40121-016-0130-1

Table 5.

Comparison of predictive models for respiratory syncytial virus hospitalization in infants born 32/33–35 wGA

FLIP [91] FLIP 2 [93] PICNIC [92] RISK [10] RISK-II [11] PONI [12]
Risk factors

7

Birth ± 10 weeks of season start

Birth weight

Breast feeding ≤2 months

Number of siblings ≥2 years

Number of family members with atopy

Number of family members with wheeze

Sex

4

Birth ± 10 weeks of season start

School-age siblings or day care attendance

Mother smoking during pregnancy

Sex

7

Small (<10th percentile) GA

Sex

Born during RSV season (Nov–Jan)

Family history without eczema

Subject or siblings attending day care

>5 individuals in the home, including the subject

>1 smoker in the household

4

Born Aug 14th to Dec 1st

Presence of siblings or subject day care attendance

Breast fed ≤2 months or not

Atopy in 1st degree family member

5

Birth between Aug 14th and Dec 1st

Day care attendance and/or siblings

Neonatal respiratory support

Breastfeeding ≤4 months

Maternal atopic constitution

6

Age on 1st October ≤3 months

Smoking of family members

Age of mother at delivery ≤25 years

Children 4–5 years old present

Smoking of mother during pregnancy

Subject day care attendance

Sensitivity/specificity 0.72/0.71 0.062/0.99 0.68/0.72 0.46/0.79

Low risk (1% hospitalization): 0.90/0.35

High risk (13% hospitalization): 0.32/0.90

NR
ROC AUCa 0.791 0.687 0.762 0.703 0.72 0.755

GA gestational age, NR not reported, ROC AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

aROC curves are constructed by plotting the sensitivity (true positives; number of RSV hospitalized infants predicted to be hospitalized) against the specificity (false positives; number of non-hospitalized infants predicted to be RSV hospitalized), with areas closer to one representing better predictive accuracy