Table 5.
Comparison of predictive models for respiratory syncytial virus hospitalization in infants born 32/33–35 wGA
FLIP [91] | FLIP 2 [93] | PICNIC [92] | RISK [10] | RISK-II [11] | PONI [12] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk factors |
7 Birth ± 10 weeks of season start Birth weight Breast feeding ≤2 months Number of siblings ≥2 years Number of family members with atopy Number of family members with wheeze Sex |
4 Birth ± 10 weeks of season start School-age siblings or day care attendance Mother smoking during pregnancy Sex |
7 Small (<10th percentile) GA Sex Born during RSV season (Nov–Jan) Family history without eczema Subject or siblings attending day care >5 individuals in the home, including the subject >1 smoker in the household |
4 Born Aug 14th to Dec 1st Presence of siblings or subject day care attendance Breast fed ≤2 months or not Atopy in 1st degree family member |
5 Birth between Aug 14th and Dec 1st Day care attendance and/or siblings Neonatal respiratory support Breastfeeding ≤4 months Maternal atopic constitution |
6 Age on 1st October ≤3 months Smoking of family members Age of mother at delivery ≤25 years Children 4–5 years old present Smoking of mother during pregnancy Subject day care attendance |
Sensitivity/specificity | 0.72/0.71 | 0.062/0.99 | 0.68/0.72 | 0.46/0.79 |
Low risk (1% hospitalization): 0.90/0.35 High risk (13% hospitalization): 0.32/0.90 |
NR |
ROC AUCa | 0.791 | 0.687 | 0.762 | 0.703 | 0.72 | 0.755 |
GA gestational age, NR not reported, ROC AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
aROC curves are constructed by plotting the sensitivity (true positives; number of RSV hospitalized infants predicted to be hospitalized) against the specificity (false positives; number of non-hospitalized infants predicted to be RSV hospitalized), with areas closer to one representing better predictive accuracy