Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2016 Feb 8;67:463–488. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111754

Table 1.

Summary of methods used to probe RNA secondary structure.

Method Biases/Limitations RNA
specificity
Mechanism of Method Experimental
Context
Refs
Adducts DMS A,C specific ssRNA Alkalates the N-1 in A and the N-
3 in C
in vivo and in
vitro
2, 3, 55, 64, 96, 99, 135, 136, 185, 194
Diethyl
Pyrocarbonate
A specific ssRNA Carboxylates N-7 in A in vitro 135, 136
Hydrazine U specific ssRNA Nucleophilic attack of U,
removing the base
in vitro 135, 136
NAI/NAI-N3 No bias, labels ribose
sugar
ssRNA Acylates 2’ hydroxyl of unpaired
nucleotides
in vivo and in
vitro
55, 119, 187
Nucleases RNase A Cleaves after purines ssRNA Leaves 5’OH and 3’P in vitro 110, 173
RNase T1 Preferrential cleavage
after guanisines
ssRNA Leaves 5’OH and 3’P in vitro 110
RNase U2 Cleaves after
pyrimidines
ssRNA Leaves 5’OH and 3’P in vitro 81, 179
RNase V1 None dsRNA Leaves 5’P and 3’OH in vitro 38, 108
Nuclease P1 None ssRNA Leaves 5’P and 3’OH in vitro 27, 84
Nuclease S1 None ssRNA Leaves 5’P and 3’OH in vitro 27, 84
RNase I None ssRNA Leaves 5’OH and 3’P in vitro 27, 84
Other NMR None N/A Aligns molecules in a magnetic
field
in vitro 9, 12, 63, 195
X-Ray
Crystallography
Must be crystallizable
RNA, in vitro folding only
N/A Scatters X-rays in an
interpretable pattern around an
RNA crystal
in vitro 62, 79, 80, 147
In silico algorithms Difficult to predict in
vivo folding
N/A mostly predicts based on free
energy and conservation
in silico 50, 51, 115, 197

Three categories of methods are covered; chemical adducts (red), RNases (green), and other (blue).