Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 5;129(21):2630–2638. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.192788

Table 2.

Study characteristics and details of interventions of the included studies

Studies Study design Age Gender male/female Number of patients Interventions Follow-up (years) Prostheses




AR IF AR IF AR IF AR IF
Ravikumar and Marsh 2000[22] RCT 81.55 ± 3.36 79.73 ± 2.49 27/244 180 91 HA/THA Screw/plate 13 HA: Austin Moore/THA: Howse II Sliding compression screw plate
Davisonet al., 2001[23] RCT 75.48 ± 1.61 73 ± 1.75 67/213 187 93 HA Screw/plate 5 Thompson HA/Monk bipolar HA Sliding compression screw plate
Parkeret al., 2002[24] RCT 82.4 ± 7.5 82.2 ± 8 91/364 229 226 HA Screw 3 Austin Moore AO cancellous screws
Keatinget al., 2006[25] RCT 75.32 ± 6.62 74.68 ± 6.74 81/286 180 187 HA/THA Screw/plate 2 NA NA
Frihagenet al., 2007[26] RCT 82.5 ± 7.32 83.2 ± 7.65 57/165 110 112 HA Screw 2 Charnley–Hastings bipolar HA Olmed screw
Parkeret al., 2010[27] RCT 82.4 ± 7.5 82.2 ± 8 91/364 229 226 HA Screw 11 Austin Moore AO cancellous screws (Stratec Ltd.)
Chammoutet al., 2012[28] RCT 78 ± 6.25 79 ± 6 21/79 43 57 THA Screw 17 Bi-metric Olmed screw
Parker, 2015[29] RCT 81.2 ± 6.5 81.5 ± 8 0/56 26 30 HA Screw/plate 1 Exeter trauma stem Targon femoral plate

AR: Arthroplasty; IF: Internal fixation; THA: Total hip arthroplasty; HA: Hemiarthroplasty; NA: Not applicable; RCT: Randomized controlled trial.