Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2016 Nov;31(7):724–736. doi: 10.1037/pag0000130

Table 3.

Introspective Processes by Intervention Group

Response Thoughts
and Feelings
Improvement Control Significance
Augment scenario 24.2 64.4 -- χ2= 42.28**
Past loss 26.6 9.7 -- χ2= 12.57**
Future success 25.8 39.3 -- χ2= 5.04*
Negative affect 35.5 3.0 -- χ2= 44.92**
Coping through rumination
avoidance
3.98 (.65) 4.03 (.59) 3.93 (.63) F = .78

Note.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01.

Percentage of responses within each intervention group are shown, except for coping through rumination avoidance where the mean score and (standard deviation) on the 6-point scale is shown, with higher scores indicating greater avoidance of rumination. The sum of percentages within the intervention groups exceeds 100 because the categories were not mutually exclusive, and a response could receive multiple codes. The control group did not provide written responses, so there were no introspective text-box responses to assess.