Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0167047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167047

Table 1. Comparison of read simulator features.

ART CuReSim dwgsim Gemsim Mason pIRS SInC NEAT
Mutation models SNPs / indels × × × × × ×
Structural variation * × *
Any ploidy * ×
Learnable from data * ×
Accepts input variants * * ×
Sequencing models Learn Q-score profile × * × * × × ×
Learn error statistics × * × * × × ×
GC% coverage bias × × × ×
Learn fragment lengths * ×
Usability Any read length × × × × * × ×
Single & paired ended reads × × × × ×
Any error rate × × × × ×
Any mutation rate × × × × × ×
Targeted sequencing × × *
Ground truth Mapping positions × × × × ×
CIGAR alignment × × ×
Variant positions × × * ×

Comparison of the main features of several existing read simulator packages.

×: feature is present in the simulator.

*: feature is either partially implemented or requires significant effort to fully use.