Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Jun 28;28(12):1836–1843. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12887

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Comparison composite integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) between two software systems, MMS and Manoview to 10 swallow values from Manoview. A. 10-swallow mean IRP, and B. 10-swallow median IRP. The values in the shaded boxes indicate 4 instances IRP values recorded >15 mmHg on MMS composite swallow, in contrast to a mean or median value <15 mmHg using the 10 swallow analysis using Manoview. All these patients had IRP within normal limits using Manoview composite analysis despite minor shifts in recorded values.