Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Jun 28;28(12):1836–1843. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12887

Table 3.

Variation of HRM Metrics Between Software Systems

EGJOO
IRP (mmHg)
IEM
DCI (mmHg.cm.s)

Concordant
n=6
Discordant
n=9
Concordant
n=13
Discordant n=6
10-swallow Manoview mean 23.2 ± 1.9 10.5 ± 1.2 394.9 ± 25 382.1 ± 84
10-swallow Manoview median 21.8 (21.0-22.2) 10.9 (7.8-13.2) 400.2 (317-456) 391.4 (236-552)
10-swallow MMS mean 24.7 ± 1.3 18.3 ± 0.6* 380.5 ± 23 345.9 ± 80
10-swallow MMS median 23.9 (23.3-26.4) 18.3 (17.8-18.9)* 388.7 (333-448) 300.9 (220-457)
MMS Composite 22.3 ± 1.8 12.8 ± 2.1 310.6 ± 22** 427.5 ± 85
Manoview Composite 22.8 ± 2.2 10.7 ± 1.2 304.0 ± 20** 301.8 ± 81**

Values are reported as mean ± standard error of mean or median (interquartile range, IQR).

*

p<0.05 compared to 10-swallow Manoview

**

p<0.05 compared to 10-swallow mean