Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Mar;44(2):269–283. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0742-5

Table 2.

Main effects of ARC on clinician EBP intentions, job-related EBP barriers, EBP adoption and use

EBP intentions
(T3)
Job-related EBP
barriers (T4)
EBP adoption (T4)
(yes/ no)a
EBP use (T4)
(% clients)

γ SE p γ SE p γ SE p γ SE p
Fixed Effects
  Intercept 4.99 .22 .000 3.06 .21 .000 1.10 .37 .003 55.94 7.51 .000
  OSC Profile (T1) .16 .27 .561 −.38 .21 .062 −.15 .47 .756 −4.22 5.67 .456
  ARC .64 .30 .030 −.70 .31 .026 1.16 .39 .003 25.13 8.40 .003
Random Effects
  Agency intercepts .13 .19 .09 168.63
  Residual variance 1.96 1.08 749.42
Pseudo-R2 .39 .52 .80 .79
ICC(1) .10 .27 .30

Note: These are two-level mixed effects regression models with random agency intercepts; ARC = Availability, Responsiveness, and Continuity organizational implementation strategy; OSC = organizational social context; EBP = evidence-based practice; T1 = Time 1; T3 = Time 3; T4 = Time 4.

a

This is a 2-level mixed effects logistic regression model with random agency intercepts.