. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Mar;44(2):269–283. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0742-5

Table 4.

ARC effects on clinician EBP adoption and use through job-related EBP barriers

	Consequent

	EBP adoption (yes/no) (T4)^a			EBP use (% clients) (T4)^b

Antecedent	γ	SE	p	γ	SE	p
Intercept	1.39	.26	<.001	62.60	6.29	<.001
OSC profile (T1)	−.49	.32	.124	−8.89	5.25	.090
ARC	.63	.36	.075	12.54	6.95	.071
Job-related EBP barriers-WG (T4)^c	−.37	.22	.099	−9.40	2.18	<.001
Job-related EBP barriers-BG (T4)^c	−.90	.30	.003	−17.46	5.35	.001

Note: ARC = Availability, Responsiveness, and Continuity organizational intervention; BG = between group; EBP = evidence-based practice; OSC = organizational social context; T1 = Time 1; T4 = Time 4; WG = within group.

This is a two-level mixed effects logistic regression model with random agency intercepts.

This is a two-level mixed effects regression model with random agency intercepts.

This variable is centered within context with means reintroduced (CWCM).