TABLE 5.
Barriers identified using the discovery tool, Cuernavaca, Mexico, May–June, 2014. (n = 41)
| Neighborhood 1 | Neighborhood 2 | Neighborhood 3 | Neighborhood 4 | |||||||||
| Socioeconomic status (low or high) | Low | Low | High | High | ||||||||
| Walkability (low or high) | High | Low | High | Low | ||||||||
| Total photos/audio files | N = 10 | N = 70 | N = 47 | N = 77 | ||||||||
| Theme | n | (%) | Theme | n | (%) | Theme | n | (%) | Theme | n | (%) | |
| Barrier 1 | Poor sidewalk quality | 6 | (60 %) | Poor sidewalk quality | 15 | (21 %) | Street characteristics | 13 | (28 %) | Poor sidewalk quality | 48 | (62 %) |
| Barrier 2 | Trash | 3 | (30 %) | Parks | 19 | (14 %) | Poor sidewalk quality | 11 | (23 %) | Street characteristics | 18 | (23 %) |
| Barrier 3 | Street characteristics | 1 | (10 %) | Unpleasant aesthetics/beauty | 5 | (7 %) | Trash | 5 | (11 %) | Trash | 7 | (9 %) |
| Facilitator 1 | Parks | 10 | (14 %) | Good sidewalk quality | 3 | (6 %) | ||||||
| Facilitator 2 | Good sidewalk quality | 2 | (3 %) | |||||||||
| Facilitator 3 | Pleasant aesthetics/beauty | 2 | (3 %) | |||||||||