Table 1.
Comparisons of PET/SPECT-MPI, MR-MPI and CTP
| Advantages | Limitations | |
|---|---|---|
| PET/SPECT-MPI | High sensibility and diagnosis accuracy | Low temporal resolution |
| Poor sensitivity for tiny ischemia | ||
| Misalignment artifacts | ||
| Misalignment artifacts | ||
| MR-MPI | Free of ionizing radiation | Long examination time |
| High soft tissue contrast than CTP and PET/SPECT | Lots of contraindications | |
| Lots of contraindications | ||
| CTP | High temporal resolution | Radioactivity |
| Coronary artery evaluation | Beam hardening artifacts | |
| Coronary artery evaluation |
PET, Positron emission tomography; SPECT, Single photon-emission CT; MPI, Myocardial perfusion imaging; MR, Magnetic resonance; CTP, CT perfusion.