Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 15;8(11):4951–4959.

Table 2.

Multivariate analyses of OS and RFS in relation to clinical parameters

Prognostic variables OS RFS

Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P
Age (>50 y vs ≤50 y) 0.547 (0.309-1.759) 0.535 0.735 (0.207-1.488) 0.487
Side (Left vs Right) 1.235 (0.246-1.147) 0.481 1.153 (0.167-1.391) 0.447
Tumor Stage (II-IV vs I) 2.194 (0.589-5.383) 0.016 2.208 (0.797-5.424) 0.059
Tumor size (>2 cm vs ≤2 cm) 2.736 (0.516-6.767) 0.065 2.838 (0.572-7.868) 0.094
Tumor grade (Grade 3 vs 1/2) 1.840 (0.084-2.979) 0.205 1.760 (0.206-2.838) 0.345
Histological type (DC vs others) 1.266 (0.265-4.225) 0.578 1.465 (0.726-4.276) 0.513
LN metastasis (yes vs no) 3.343 (1.173-7.618) 0.007 3.375 (1.109-7.7) 43 0.015
AKIP1 expression (high vs low) 2.891 (1.097-4.216) 0.022 2.925 (1.136-4.357) 0.018

DC: ductal carcinoma; LN: lymph nodes.