Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 29;6:37964. doi: 10.1038/srep37964

Table 2. Performance evaluation of different single incidence assays and multiassay algorithms (MAAs), Kisumu Incidence Cohort Study (KICoS): 2007–2009.

Assay/MAA Recent, n (%) w (95%CI) Incidence-% (95% CI)
BED, n = 125
 BED only 19 (15.2) 300 (270–329) 2.53 (1.35–3.71)
 BED + VL 16 (12.8) 300 (270–329) 2.13 (1.05–3.20)
 BED + LAg + VL* 11 (8.8) 300 (270–329) 1.46 (0.58–2.35)
LAg, n = 128
 LAg only 17 (13.2) 184 (161–208) 3.60 (1.81–5.39)
 LAg + VL 16 (12.5) 184 (161–208) 3.39 (1.65–5.12)
Biorad, n = 125
 Biorad only 25 (20.0) 293 (263–323) 3.40 (2.00–4.81)
 Biorad + VL 23 (18.4) 293 (263–323) 3.13 (1.79–4.48)

Note: Number of persons in the survey = 1106, persons HIV negative = 973, persons HIV positive = 133. BED, BED-CEIA OD-n < 0.8; LAg, LAg avidity OD-n < 1.5; Biorad, Biorad avidity AI < 30%; VL, viral load > 1000 copies/mL; w, mean duration of recency in days; CI, confidence intervals. *selected MAA.