Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 8;9(3):698–704. doi: 10.1159/000452297

Table 1.

Summary of heterotopic ossification in colorectal carcinoma

First author [ref.] Reported year Age, years Sex Tumor location Size, cm Pathology Lymph node metastasis TNM classification
Haque [3] 1996 78 M Rectum 7.0 × 4.0 Mode-AC and Muci-AC N.D. N.D.
46 F Cecum 1.9 × 2.1 Muci-AC N.D. N.D.
55 F Transverse colon 8.0 × 5.0 × 3.0 Muci-AC N.D. N.D.
Beauchamp [5] 1997 64 M Rectum 9.0 Mode-AC (+) T4, N2, MX
Papadopoulos [6] 1998 47 F Cecum N.D. Mode-AC N.D. N.D.
Alper [7] 2000 56 M Rectum N.D. Muci-AC (+): 2/12 N.D.
Imai [8] 2001 50 F Ascending colon 4.0 × 4.0 × 6.5 Mode-AC and Poor-AC (+): 6/43 N.D.
Szumiło [9] 2004 79 M Rectum 4.0 × 5.0 × 0.8 Mode-AC (+): 2/10 T3, N1, MX
Matsumoto [10] 2004 67 M Rectum 9.0 × 8.5 × 7.0 Well-AC (+): 4/13 N.D.
Badmos [11] 2011 48 M Rectosigmoid 4.0 × 4.0 × 2.5 Well-AC (−) T3, N0, MX
Present case 2016 57 M Rectum 8.0 × 7.0 Mode-AC (+): 1/12 T4a, N1a, M0

N.D., no data; Mode-AC, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; Muci-AC, mucinous adenocarcinoma; Poor-AC, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; Well-AC, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma; TNM, tumor node metastasis; T, primary tumor site; N, regional lymph node involvement; M, presence or otherwise of distant metastatic spread; (+), present; (−), absent.