Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Dec;56(3-4):205–216. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9742-y

Table 1.

Prediction of mother-reported outcomes by group assignment and the passage of time for children who were ages 1.5–5 at baseline

Time Time2 Group assignment Time × group assignment Time2 × group assignment
Mother-reported (n = 67–99)
 Mental health
  Internalizing 0.40 (−0.54; −0.26)*** 0.03 (0.01; 0.04)*** −3.65 (−5.61; −1.68)** −0.04 (−0.18; 0.11) 0.01 (0.00; 0.03)
  Externalizing −0.25 (−0.41; −0.10)** 0.02 (0.01; 0.03)** −3.12 (−5.37; −0.86)** n.t. n.t.
 Child care/school
  Positive attitude −0.01 (−0.03; 0.01) n.t. 0.04 (−0.12; 0.20) n.t. n.t.
  Trouble (LO) 0.05 (0.00; 0.10)* n.t. −0.13 (−0.56; 0.31) n.t. n.t.
  Absences −0.07 (−0.15; 0.01) n.t. 0.18 (−0.60; 0.97) n.t. n.t.
  Good experiences (LO) 0.02 (−0.07; 0.10) n.t. 0.30 (−0.25; 0.84) n.t. n.t.

Group assignment was effect coded such that FCTI = 1 and control = − 1. LO indicates log odds. For child care/school trouble, odds ratio (OR) for time = 1.05 (1.00; 1.10), OR for group = 0.88 (0.57; 1.36). For good experiences, OR for time = 1.02 (0.98; 1.06), OR for group = 1.35 (1.10; 1.66). All other values are b coefficients (confidence interval in parentheses)

“n.t.” indicates that the variables were not tested in the final model because of nonsignificance in prior models. The variables Time and Group were included regardless of significance

p < .10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001