Table 3.
Day 1 (n = 22) | Day 5 (n = 16) | Day 10 (n = 9) | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MT – Elbow flexor compartment, [cm] (median ± IQR) |
3.20 ± 0.58 | 3.30 ± 0.87 | 2.98 ± 0.83 | 0.62 |
MT – Gastrocnemius, [cm] (median ± IQR) |
1.29 ± 0.60 | 1.34 ± 0.43 | 1.14 ± 0.65 | 0.72 |
MT – Vastus lateralis [cm] (median ± IQR) | 1.53 ± 0.77 | 1.40 ± 0.46 | 1.18 ± 0.36 | 0.002* |
FL – Gastrocnemius [cm] (median ± IQR) |
3.99 ± 1.84 | 3.69 ± 1.37 | 3.43 ± 2.12 | 0.90 |
FL – Vastus lateralis [cm] (median ± IQR) |
8.1 ± 3.06 | 8.45 ± 4.55 | 7.85 ± 5.89 | 0.89 |
PA – Gastrocnemius [degrees] (median ± IQR) | 20.93 ± 6.41 | 19.82 ± 5.65 | 17.5 ± 3.91 | 0.37 |
PA – Vastus lateralis [degrees] (median ± IQR) | 11.09 ± 4.88 | 9.86 ± 3.69 | 8.03 ± 3.86 | 0.018* |
MT Muscle thickness, FL Fascicle length, PA Pennation angle
Significance tested with Friedman’s test, followed by pairwise Friedman’s tests where p < 0.05. Stastically significant p-values have been marked with *. Muscle thickness and pennation angle of the vastus lateralis muscle significantly decreased over both 5 and 10 days