Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 28;16:922. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2961-2

Table 3.

Pap class distribution of included patients of which test results of all 3 assays are available (n = 11,333).

Pap class Bethesda classification Included samples (N) Pap class distribution of tested cohort (DuSC) Pap class distribution of Dutch screening populationa HC2 hrHPV prevalence
%(N)
cobas hrHPV prevalence
%(N)
Aptima hrHPV prevalence
%(N)
Overall hrHPV prevalence
0 - 191 1.7% 1.7% 6.8% (13) 5.2% (10) 4.2% (8) 5.4 ± 1.3%
1 Normal 10,639 93.9% 93.6% 5.8% (620) 5.7% (609) 5.1% (545) 5.5 ± 0.4%
2 ASC-US 314 2.8% 3.0% 47.8% (150) 41.1% (129) 39.5% (124) 42.8 ± 4.4%
3a1 LSIL 71 0.6% 0.7% 91.5% (65) 85.9% (61) 84.5% (60) 87.3 ± 3.7%
3a2 HSIL (moderate) 50 0.4% 0.4% 94.0% (47) 94.0% (47) 94.0% (47) 94.0 ± 0.0%
3b HSIL (severe) 62 0.5% 0.6% 95.2% (59) 93.5% (58) 96.8% (60) 95.2% ± 1.7%
4 CIS/AIS 6 0.01% 0.0% 83.3% (5) 83.3% (5) 83.3% (5) 83.3 ± 0.0%
Total (N) 11,333 959 919 849

Number of included samples per Pap class and Pap class distribution of study cohort vs Pap class distribution of the Dutch screening program; and hrHPV prevalences per assay and overall mean

Pap 0 = sample inadequate for cytology

aBased on the Dutch national pathology registry (PALGA database)

ASC-US Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance, LSIL Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, HSIL High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, CIS Carcinoma in situ, AIS Adenocarcinoma in situ