Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec;138(6):e20161042. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1042

TABLE 4.

Disadvantage, Striving, and Race as Predictors of Diabetes Status at Age 29

Predictors Diabetes Status
Model 1, Whole Sample (N = 5366) Model 2, Blacks (n = 1431) Model 3, Whitesa (n = 3935)
b (95% CI) b (95% CI) b (95% CI)
1. Sex, male 0.043 (−0.117 to 0.204) 0.142 (−0.069 to 0.353) −0.014 (−0.218 to 0.191)
2. BMI (age 29) 0.031*** (0.023 to 0.038) 0.020** (0.006 to 0.033) 0.036*** (0.026 to 0.046)
3. Disadvantage (age 16) 0.007 (−0.130 to 0.143) 0.072 (−0.035 to 0.178) 0.004 (−0.121 to 0.128)
4. Striving (age 16) 0.010 (−0.083 to 0.104) 0.027 (−0.112 to 0.167) 0.017 (−0.080 to 0.113)
5. Disadvantage × striving –0.076 (−0.186 to 0.034) 0.117* (0.002 to 0.233) −0.071 (−0.170 to 0.029)
6. Race 0.610*** (0.456 to 0.765)
7. Disadvantage × race 0.036 (−0.132 to 0.205)
8. Striving × race –0.069 (−0.248 to 0.110)
9. Disadvantage × striving × race 0.188* (0.035 to 0.341)

b, unstandardized regression coefficient, which represents the rate of change of the outcome variable (log odds of diabetes status) as a function of a change of 1 unit in the predictor variable with all other predictor variables held constant; CI, confidence interval; —, no data.

a

White participants indicated that they had no Hispanic heritage.

*

P < .05.

**

P < .01.

***

P < .001.