Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 10;8(11):327. doi: 10.3390/toxins8110327

Table 2.

Effects of dietary AFB1 and CM concentrations on hepatic antioxidant parameters in chicks at week 2 1.

Item Control AFB1 CM AFB1 + CM
GPX, U/mg 127.8 ± 5.1 b 111.1 ± 10.3 a 159.9 ± 15.1 c 159.7 ± 8.9 c
SOD, U/mg 156.8 ± 5.2 a,b 149.9 ± 9.7 a 170.2 ± 6.7 b 162.5 ± 8.7 a,b
CAT, U/mg 13.6 ± 0.9 b 11.4 ± 1.6 a 15.4 ± 1.2 b,c 16.7 ± 1.0 c
GST, U/mg 61.5 ± 1.1 60.6 ± 1.9 62.3 ± 5.1 62.0 ± 2.4
GSH, μmol/g 48.5 ± 10.1 b 33.5 ± 3.9 a 62.8 ± 17.6 b 53.4 ± 15.6 b
MDA, μmol/g 3.2 ± 0.4 a 6.4 ± 1.3 b 2.9 ± 0.5 a 3.2 ± 0.6 a
8-OHdG, nmol/mg 152.2 ± 8.1 a 179.5 ± 5.4 b 157.9 ± 2.9 a 156.8 ± 4.7 a

1 Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5), and means with different superscript letters differ (p < 0.05). AFB1, aflatoxin B1; CAT, catalase; CM, curcumin; GPX, glutathione peroxidase; GSH, glutathione; GST, glutathione-S transferases; MDA, malondialdehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase; 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine. Experimental details of Control and AFB1 groups are given in Sun et al. (2016) [12].