Table 2.
Compound | Drug type | Transfectiona | Cell‐countb | Hoechst‐intensityc | Resazurin‐intensityd | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transfection fold‐increase | Tranilast | Anti‐allergy | 3.63 | 0.55 | 1.24 | |
Piceid | Stilbenoid | 2.63 | 0.69 | 1.17 | ||
5‐Fluorocytosine | Pyrimidine analogue | 2.54 | 0.52 | 1.50 | 1.58 | |
Cinanserin | Serotonin receptor antagonist | 2.53 | 0.63 | 1.41 | ||
Zardaverine | Phosphodiesterase inhibitor | 2.26 | 0.55 | 1.36 | ||
Nateglinide | ATP potassium channel closer | 2.08 | 0.51 | 1.23 | 1.21 | |
Eryped | Macrolide antibiotic | 1.99 | 0.72 | 1.26 | 1.26 | |
Mestinon | Cholinesterase inhibitor | 1.83 | 0.77 | 1.21 | 1.23 | |
Acyclovir | DNA polymerase inhibition (anti‐viral) | 1.78 | 0.60 | |||
Stiripentol | GABA receptor modulator | 1.77 | 0.72 | 1.23 | ||
Transfection fold‐decrease | Epigallocatechin gallate | Flavonoid | 0 | 0.80 | ||
Cefixime trihydrate | β‐lactam antibiotic | 0.017 | 1.45 | 0.84 | ||
Cefdinir | β‐lactam antibiotic | 0.032 | 1.35 | 0.88 | ||
Cefuroxime | β‐lactam antibiotic | 0.039 | 1.39 | |||
Rolitetracycline | Tetracycline antibiotic | 0.063 | 1.42 | 0.86 | ||
Cefatrizine propylene glycol | β‐lactam antibiotic | 0.095 | 1.75 | 0.78 | ||
Tetracycline | Tetracycline antibiotic | 0.139 | 1.08 | 0.85 | ||
Taxifolin‐(+) | Flavonoid | 0.162 | 1.22 | 0.87 | ||
(+/−)‐Epinephrine hydrochloride | Adrenergic receptor agonist | 0.35 | 1.36 | 0.83 | ||
IsoquercitrinHyperoside | FlavonoidFlavonoid | 0.358 | 1.68 | 0.86 |
Note. Empty values indicate nonsignificant fold‐change.
Transfection fold‐changes were calculated from duplicate averages of EGFP fluorescence, measured by EGFP cell‐count (image processing) or EGFP intensity (plate reader and image processing), relative to the same measurement averaged from the vehicle controls in each compound's respective plates. These measurements were normalized in two separate ways, total cell‐count (determined by Hoechst‐count), and transfected cell‐count (determined by EGFP‐count), for measurement of transfection per cell as well as transfection per transfected cell.
Cell‐count fold‐changes were calculated from duplicate averages of image processing measurements of Hoechst‐count relative to the average Hoechst‐count measurements of vehicle controls in each compound's respective plates. Cell‐count fold‐changes are shown for each hit presented as a general toxicity reference, not to imply significant increase or decrease.
Hoechst‐intensity fold changes were calculated from duplicate averages of plate reader or image processing measurements of Hoechst‐intensity normalized by total cell‐count (determined by Hoechst‐count), relative to the average Hoechst‐intensity measurements of vehicle controls in each compound's respective plates.
Resazurin‐intensity fold changes were calculated from duplicate averages of plate reader measurements of resazurin intensity normalized by cell‐count (determined by Hoechst‐count), relative to the average resazurin‐intensity measurements of vehicle controls in each compound's respective plates.