Table 1. Summary of cell response to nanotopographies.
Technique | Materials used | Pattern and dimension | Cell type | Cell responses | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymer demixing | PS/PBrS | Nanoislands with an average height of 11, 38 and 85 nm respectively | hFOB | Higher cell adhesion and larger cell size on 11 nm nanoislands. | [42] |
Similar ALP activity on 85 nm nanoislands and TCPS | |||||
Polymer demixing | PMMA | 3:1000 imprint (height:45 nm, diameter: 2.2 μm, center-to-center distance: 4.3 μm) | HMSCs | Increased cell spreading, enhanced expression of stress fibers, tubulin and vimentin networks and higher OCN and OPN expression on nanotopographies compared to control | [47] |
3:3000 imprint (height: 33 nm, diameter: 1.7 μm, center-to-center distance: 2.9 μm) | Cells extending filopodia on hemispheres and curling around imprints | ||||
Hemispheres (height:10 ± 1 nm, diameter: 144 ± 11 nm, spacing:184 ± 24 nm) | |||||
Polymer demixing | PLLA/PS | Pit-shaped topography of 14 nm, 29 nm, 45 nm deep respectively | hFOB | Higher cell coverage, αv integrin and paxillin expression on 14 nm and 29 nm | [46] |
Greatest cell attachment on 14 nm followed by 29 nm and 45 nm pits | |||||
Invariant vinculin expression on pits | |||||
Photolithography | PMMA | Pit diameter to depth ratio: 30:310 nm (denoted as 30:300P) 40:362 nm (denoted as 40:400P) | hBMCs | hBMCs conformed, formed filopodial contact and exhibited increased cell spreading, increased tubulin and vimentin networks as well as OCN and OPN expressions on the pit patterns | [54] |
Larger hBMCs cell area, more defined stress fibers and mature nodule formation (after 21 days) on 40:400P | |||||
Groove width to depth ratio: 5:510 nm (denoted as 5:500G) 50:327 nm (denoted as 50:300G) | Better contact guidance, significant reduction of cell area, highly aligned stress fibers along the groove direction and tubulin condensing along the ridges on 5:500G | ||||
Aligned vimentin and increased areas of OCN and OPN production on groove patterns | |||||
EBL | PMMA | 100 nm deep (D: 120 nm) PMMA imprints arranged: | MSC | Elongated, and aligned morphology with fibroblastic appearance on SQ and planar control | [49] |
SQ: in square array with center-to-center spacing of 300 nm | Decreased osteoprogenitor density on HEX | ||||
HEX: hexagonal array | Increased level of OPN, OCN and mineralization on DSQ50 after 28 days | ||||
DSQ50: randomly up to 50 nm on both axes from their position in a true square | Osteoblastic morphology and expressed foci of OPN on DSQ20 | ||||
DSQ20: randomly up to 20 nm on both axes from their position in a true square | Denser cell growth on RAND compared with planar PMMA | ||||
RAND: randomly over a 150 μm by 150 μm field, repeated to fill a 1 cm2 area | Polygonal, osteoblastic morphology on RAND after 21 days | ||||
EBL | PC | PC imprints comprised of 120 nm diameter pits with 300 nm center-to-center spacing in SQ and HEX arrangements | Osteoprogenitor cell | Stellate cell structure, higher number of filopodia per μm of membrane and presence of cortical actin on PC imprints | [52] |
Higher cell spread on hexagonal arrangement and planar control Stress fibers on planar control | |||||
EBL | Polycaprolactone (PCL) | SQ: PCL imprints comprised of 120 nm deep pits in square arrangement with center-center spacing of 300 nm | MSC | SQ induced a switch from osteogenic stimulation to a surface conducive to MSC growth and permitted prolonged retention to MSC markers and multipotency | [50] |
NSQ50: PCL imprints comprised of 120 nm deep pits with ±50 nm offset in both x- and y- axes | MSC differentiated into osteogenic cells on NSQ50 and OGM controls after four and eight weeks | ||||
STRO-1, ALCAM, OPN and OCN markers expressed by cells on NSQ50 and OGM | |||||
Increased OPN expression on NSQ50 and OGM after a few weeks | |||||
Cells exhibited raised/similar metabolomic profiles on NSQ50 and OGM compared to SQ |
Abbreviation: OGM, osteogenic media.