Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 9;113(47):13307–13312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611631113

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Impact on butterfly wings. (A) Image sequences of a droplet (D0= 2.35 mm, We= 389) impacting on a supported and an unsupported butterfly wing of a specimen from the species C. hyale. Arrows indicate location of impalement. (Scale bar, 1 mm.) (B) Image of the butterfly and micrographs of the wings used for the droplet impact experiment in A. (Scale bar, left to right, 10 mm, 50 μm, and 5 μm.) (C) Φ for a droplet (D0= 2.35 mm) impacting on butterfly wings of the three tested species in supported (rigid) and unsupported (flexible) cases: Butterfly 1, C. hyale, We= 389; Butterfly 2, C. sapphire, We= 568; and Butterfly 3, I. io, We= 401. The sample size was n 9. Significant differences are indicated by asterisks (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).