Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 30;7:1810. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01810

Table 1.

Structural and subcellular localization analysis of the EgTIPs.

Ar/R selectivity filter NPA motif∗∗ Froger’s positions



Protein Cha Size pI MW (kDa) TMb Locc H2 LC H5 LE1 LE2 LB LE P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
EgTIP1.1 3 260 5.56 26 6 Vacuole H F I A V NPA NPA T S A Y W
EgTIP1.2 10 252 4.68 26 6 Vacuole H F I A V NPA NPA T S A Y W
EgTIP1.3 2 252 4.79 26 6 Vacuole H F I A V NPA NPA T S A Y W
EgTIP1.4 10 251 5.16 25.8 6 Vacuole H F I A V NPA NPA T S A Y W
EgTIP2.1 6 248 5.52 25 6 Vacuole H H I G R NPA NPA T S A Y W
EgTIP2.2 4 250 5.12 25 6 Vacuole H H I G R NPA NPA T S A Y W
EgTIP2.3 4 259 6.78 26.4 6 Cell membrane/vacuole H G F G R NPA NPA A S A H
EgTIP3.1 11 262 6.7 27.5 6 Vacuole H F I A L NPA NPA T A A Y W
EgTIP3.2 8 259 6.04 27.8 6 Vacuole S L I A R NPA NPA T A A Y W
EgTIP4.1 3 243 5.91 25.3 6 Vacuole H H I A R NPA NPA T S A Y W
EgTIP5.1 11 256 6.81 25.7 6 Cell membrane/vacuole N F V G C NPA NPA T S A Y W

Ar/R: aromatic/arginine; H2: transmembrane helix 2; LC: loop C; H5: transmembrane helix 5; LE: loop E; ∗∗NPA: Asn-Pro-Ala. aChromosome location of the corresponding gene. bNumber of transmembrane (TM) helices predicted by TMpred. cBest possible subcellular localization predicted by Plant-mPloc.