Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 16;2016:2962047. doi: 10.1155/2016/2962047

Table 5.

Comparative results between our method and the conventional method.

Method VOE [%] ASD [mm] RMSD [mm] MSD [mm]
Conventional ABM 3.8574 ± 2.10 0.8304 ± 0.33 1.8783 ± 0.51 32.2461 ± 8.12
Our method 3.5057 ± 1.94 0.7917 ± 0.27 1.6957 ± 0.66 21.3430 ± 8.17