Table 5.
Comparative results between our method and the conventional method.
Method | VOE [%] | ASD [mm] | RMSD [mm] | MSD [mm] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Conventional ABM | 3.8574 ± 2.10 | 0.8304 ± 0.33 | 1.8783 ± 0.51 | 32.2461 ± 8.12 |
Our method | 3.5057 ± 1.94 | 0.7917 ± 0.27 | 1.6957 ± 0.66 | 21.3430 ± 8.17 |