Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 15;6(11):e013106. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013106

TableĀ 2.

Association of clinical variables with the risk of erosive oesophagitis in males*

Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Clinical variables OR (95% CI) p Value OR (95% CI) p Value OR (95% CI) p Value
Age (years) 1.02 (1.01 to 1.02) <0.001 1.02 (1.01 to 1.02) <0.001 1.02 (1.01 to 1.02) <0.001
Metabolic syndrome (yes vs no) 1.25 (1.08 to 1.44) 0.002 1.26 (1.09 to 1.45) 0.002
NAFLD (yes vs no) 1.12 (0.98 to 1.29) 0.101 1.14 (0.98 to 1.30) 0.095
Hiatal hernia (yes vs no) 19.88 (14.42 to 27.41) <0.001 20.03 (14.53 to 27.61) <0.001 19.75 (14.33 to 27.23) <0.001
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 1.01 (1.00 to 1.01) <0.001 1.01 (1.01 to 1.01) <0.001 1.01 (1.00 to 1.01) <0.001
Alcohol consumption (yes vs no) 0.93 (0.43 to 1.98) 0.841 0.87 (0.41 to 1.87) 0.734 0.91 (0.42 to 1.94) 0.800
Tea drinking (yes vs no) 1.08 (0.94 to 1.23) 0.285 1.07 (0.93 to 1.22) 0.344 1.06 (0.93 to 1.22) 0.364
Smoking (yes vs no) 1.15 (0.97 to 1.35) 0.110 1.16 (0.98 to 1.37) 0.078 1.14 (0.96 to 1.35) 0.129
Habitual exercise (yes vs no) 1.26 (1.03 to 1.54) 0.027 1.23 (1.01 to 1.51) 0.043 1.25 (1.02 to 1.53) 0.034

Adjusted OR.

*Binary logistic regression analysis.

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.