Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799

TableĀ 2.

The STARD 2015 list10

Section and topic No Item
Title or abstract
1 Identification as a study of diagnostic accuracy using at least one measure of accuracy (such as sensitivity, specificity, predictive values or AUC)
Abstract
2 Structured summary of study design, methods, results and conclusions (for specific guidance, see STARD for Abstracts)
Introduction
3 Scientific and clinical background, including the intended use and clinical role of the index test
4 Study objectives and hypotheses
Methods
Study design 5 Whether data collection was planned before the index test and reference standard were performed (prospective study) or after (retrospective study)
Participants 6 Eligibility criteria
7 On what basis potentially eligible participants were identified (such as symptoms, results from previous tests, inclusion in registry)
8 Where and when potentially eligible participants were identified (setting, location and dates)
9 Whether participants formed a consecutive, random or convenience series
Test methods 10a Index test, in sufficient detail to allow replication
10b Reference standard, in sufficient detail to allow replication
11 Rationale for choosing the reference standard (if alternatives exist)
12a Definition of and rationale for test positivity cut-offs or result categories of the index test, distinguishing prespecified from exploratory
12b Definition of and rationale for test positivity cut-offs or result categories of the reference standard, distinguishing prespecified from exploratory
13a Whether clinical information and reference standard results were available to the performers or readers of the index test
13b Whether clinical information and index test results were available to the assessors of the reference standard
Analysis 14 Methods for estimating or comparing measures of diagnostic accuracy
15 How indeterminate index test or reference standard results were handled
16 How missing data on the index test and reference standard were handled
17 Any analyses of variability in diagnostic accuracy, distinguishing prespecified from exploratory
18 Intended sample size and how it was determined
Results
Participants 19 Flow of participants, using a diagram
20 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of participants
21a Distribution of severity of disease in those with the target condition
21b Distribution of alternative diagnoses in those without the target condition
22 Time interval and any clinical interventions between index test and reference standard
Test results 23 Cross tabulation of the index test results (or their distribution) by the results of the reference standard
24 Estimates of diagnostic accuracy and their precision (such as 95% CIs)
25 Any adverse events from performing the index test or the reference standard
Discussion
26 Study limitations, including sources of potential bias, statistical uncertainty and generalisability
27 Implications for practice, including the intended use and clinical role of the index test
Other information
28 Registration number and name of registry
29 Where the full study protocol can be accessed
30 Sources of funding and other support; role of funders