Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 9;6(11):e009896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009896

Table 3.

Sociodemographic characteristics and respondents' perceptions of how positive and negative encounters with healthcare professionals influenced their ability to return to work

Return to work was…
Positive encounters
Negative encounters
All n, (%) …facilitated, n (%) …not influenced, n (%) …impeded, n (%) …not influenced, n (%)
Categorical variables 590 (100) 255 (100) 258 (100) 34 (100) 221 (100)
Gender
 Male 414 (70) 178 (70) 178 (69) 25 (74) 151 (68)
 Female 176 (30) 77 (30) 80 (31) 9 (26) 70 (32)
Age
 23–59 269 (46) 138 (54) 108 (42) 21 (62) 98 (44)
 60–67 321 (54) 117 (46) 150 (58) 13 (38) 123 (56)
Country of birth
 Sweden 491 (83) 223 (87) 218 (84) 24 (71) 187 (85)
 Other 99 (17)  32 (13) 40 (16) 10 (29) 34 (15)
Marital status
 Married 316 (54) 140 (55) 136 (53) 17 (50) 122 (55)
 Unmarried 150 (25) 66 (26) 69 (27) 7 (21) 56 (25)
 Divorced/widowed 124 (21) 49 (19) 53 (21) 10 (29) 43 (19)
Income
 Low 108 (18) 25 (10) 59 (23) 10 (29) 50 (23)
 Average 297 (50) 116 (45) 138 (53) 15 (44) 118 (53)
 High 185 (31) 114 (45) 61 (24) 9 (26) 53 (24)
Level of education
 Compulsory 145 (25) 68 (27) 65 (25) 5 (15) 60 (15)
 High school 345 (58) 147 (58) 148 (57) 25 (74) 121 (55)
 University 100 (17) 40 (16) 45 (17) 4 (12) 40 (18)

The question read: ‘How have positive (negative) encounters from healthcare professionals affected your ability to return to work?’ There was one response option that read 1 ‘I have not been positively (negatively) encountered’. The other response options ranged from 2 ‘Impeded (facilitated) very much’ to 6 ‘Facilitated (impeded) very much’.