Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 29;16:193. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0731-6

Table 4.

Systematic review: PEDro ratings for eligible trials (n = 9)

Study Random allocation Concealed allocation Baseline comparability Blinding of subjects Blinding of therapists Blinding of assessors Adequate follow-up Intention to treat analysis Between-group comparisons Point estimates and variability Total score/out of 10
Chrysagis 2012 [47] + + + + + + + + 8
Fong 2012 [48] + + + + + + 6
Fong 2013 [49] + + + + + + 6
Hammond 2013 [50] + + + + + 5
Hillier [46] + + + + + + + 7
Ledebt 2005 [44] + + + 3
Peens 2008 [42] + + + + 4
Polatajko 1995 [43] + + + + + + 6
Tsai 2009 [45] + + + 3