Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 25;18(11):1135–1142. doi: 10.1111/jch.12884

Table 3.

Comparison of Estimates Obtained From 24‐Hour Urine and Spot Urine Samples

Equation Salt Intake, g/d (mean, SD) Difference (95% CI) P Value
No. Baseline No. Follow‐Up
24‐h urine 88 9.43 (3.69) 73 7.44 (4.09) −1.99 (−3.20 to −0.78) .002
INTERSALT equation 509 8.48 (2.13) 511 8.05 (2.11) −0.43 (−0.69 to −0.17) .001
Tanaka equation 509 9.94 (2.64) 511 9.21 (2.84) −0.73 (−1.06 to −0.39) <.001
Mage equation 509 10.07 (8.50) 511 8.74 (8.25) −1.34 (−2.37 to −0.31) .011
Kawasaki equation 509 13.98 (5.06) 511 12.88 (5.19) −1.09 (−1.72 to −0.46) .001
Simple equationa 509 12.37 (9.85) 511 10.64 (9.38) −1.73 (−2.92 to −0.55) .004

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; INTERSALT, International Cooperative Study on Salt, Other Factors, and Blood Pressure; SD, standard deviation.

a

Based on the equation used by Mann and Gerber (2010)19 to estimate 24‐hour sodium excretion from spot urine samples. The equation predicts the 24‐hour estimate by calculating the ratio of sodium and creatinine in the spot sample then multiplying this ratio by the individuals’ measured 24‐hour creatinine excretion. In this paper, the equation was modified such that 24‐hour creatinine excretion was predicted using Tanaka's formula: 24‐hour predicted creatinine (mg/d)=−2.04×age+14.89×weight+16.14×height−2244.45. In addition, 24‐hour predicted sodium was computed using the formula: [Spot Na (mmol/l) ÷ (Spot Crea (mg/dL)×10)]×24‐hour predicted creatinine (mg/d).