Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 30;16:926. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2928-3

Table 2.

Correlation analysis of the expression of wtERa, ERa36 and ER-beta with clinical features (cohort P)

Clinical features Pearson correlation analysis
Correlation coefficient P valuea
wtERa Gender (Female vs. Male) 0.662 0.000
Age (>58 vs. ≤58) 0.276 0.007
International Normalized Ratio −0.442 0.000
Size of the largest tumor (>5 cm vs. ≤5 cm) −0.306 0.003
Intra-hepatic recurrence (Yes vs. No) −0.308 0.003
Extra-hepatic metastasis (Yes vs. No) −0.310 0.002
Adjuvant treatments after operation (Yes vs. No) −0.348 0.001
ERa36 Non-tumour liver (Cirrhosis vs. Fibrosis vs. Normal) 0.270 0.009
Extra-hepatic metastasis (Yes vs. No) −0.274 0.007
Pathological Grade (Poor vs. Moderate vs. Well) −0.274 0.007
Liver cirrhosis (Yes vs. No) 0.267 0.009
ERb Gender (Female vs. Male) 0.234 0.023
Age (>58 vs. ≤58) 0.308 0.002
International Normalized Ratio −0.273 0.009
HBsAg (+ vs. -) −0.377 0.000

a Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)