Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 31;9(2):1472. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1472

Figure 4. Forest plot showing relative risk (RR) of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) with quadripolar lead (QL) and bipolar lead (BL) at follow-up. The use of QL results in a 76 % reduction (relative risk 0.24; 95% CI: 0.09-0.65, p=0.005) of PNS when compared with BL. M-H: Mentel-Haenszel.

Figure 4.