Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 3;115(11):1304–1312. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.356

Table 3. Subgroups of rest-activity rhythm analysis: Means, standard deviations, and differences between groups in outcomes over time according to generalised estimating equations.

  Baseline
3 months
6 months
   
  No. of patients Mean SD No. of patients Mean SD No. of patients Mean SD Wald χ2 P of group × time
Poor r24 (⩽0.30)
PSQI                   9.395 0.009*
 Walking exercise group 11 11.64 3.91 9 6.56 3.09 10 6.70 3.06    
 Usual-care groupa 18 9.39 3.42 17 9.06 4.88 16 8.75 4.55    
TST                   14.382 0.001*
 Walking exercise group 11 348.55 82.85 7 357.62 58.60 8 413.35 70.56    
 Usual-care groupa 18 421.09 108.74 16 364.18 112.98 15 374.23 132.19    
Favorable r24 (⩾0.46)
PSQI                   9.395 0.009*
 Walking exercise group 21 7.57 4.82 19 6.11 2.89 16 5.63 3.67    
 Usual-care groupa 12 8.25 5.08 11 8.73 5.12 11 8.73 4.17    
TST                   14.382 0.001*
 Walking exercise group 21 405.23 91.96 18 397.54 65.88 16 404.00 89.65    
 Usual-care groupa 12 394.36 51.89 8 389.90 40.92 8 386.65 77.99    
Poor I<O (⩽93.96)
PSQI                   22.386 0.0001*
 Walking exercise group 11 12.27 4.17 9 7.00 3.57 7 8.00 3.83    
 Usual-care groupa 23 8.35 3.79 21 8.24 4.92 19 8.37 4.81    
TST                   4.713 0.095
 Walking exercise group 11 327.45 113.76 8 359.02 112.56 7 368.29 77.43    
 Usual-care groupa 23 391.15 102.75 20 349.35 89.98 19 349.93 116.93    
Favorable I<O (⩾97.35)
PSQI                   1.690 0.430
 Walking exercise group 22 7.82 4.65 20 5.20 2.80 19 4.95 2.76    
 Usual-care groupa 14 8.36 4.43 12 8.08 4.23 12 7.33 3.80    
TST                   1.999 0.368
 Walking exercise group 22 434.14 64.12 17 409.84 78.36 16 425.47 61.21    
 Usual-care groupa 14 397.01 69.07 8 387.61 70.39 8 382.31 98.32    

Abbreviations: I<O=in-bed less than out-of-bed dichotomy index; PSQI=Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; r24=24-h autocorrelation coefficient; TST=total sleep time.

Note. Generalised estimating equations were used for repeated measurements and the AR(1) correlation structure. All models were adjusted for age, sex, marital status, cancer stage and treatment, and significant differences in demographic data, disease characteristics, and baseline outcomes in each subgroup.

*P<0.05.

a

Usual-care group is the reference group.