Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 30;11(11):e0166103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166103

Table 3. The Net Benefits of Increased Aspirin Use Would Be Substantial ($2015 thousands).

  Difference with Baseline
Guideline Adherence* Universal Eligibility**
  Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI
Value of expected quality-adjusted life-years gained 14.2 [4.71 to 25.13] 19.9 [7.46 to 34.23]
Expected health-care and medication costs
    Health care excluding gastrointestinal bleeds 5.5 [0.36 to 11.64] 6.6 [0.47 to 12.3]
    Gastrointestinal bleeds 0.1 [0.02 to 0.13] 0.1 [0.03 to 0.2]
    Aspirin medication 0.1 [0.06 to 0.06] 0.1 [0.1 to 0.1]
    Total 5.7 [0.51 to 11.77] 6.8 [0.69 to 12.54]
Net value per capita 8.5 [3.06 to 16.64] 13.0 [5.74 to 22.65]
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio 64.2 [13.98 to 112.93] 55.3 [13.76 to 91.05]

*: Individuals follow 2009 USPSTF guidelines for primary prevention of heart diseases and stroke until age 79 and use aspirin for secondary prevention at all ages

**: All individuals over age 50 are assigned to use aspirin daily. All amounts are in present value at age 51, computed with a 3% discount rate. Quality-adjusted life-years adjust length of life for quality based on a person’s chronic conditions and functional status. 95% confidence intervals with regard to the uncertainty of the effectiveness of aspirin are presented in brackets.