Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 30.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Dec 9;8(1):38–46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001123

Table 2.

Embolic Protection Devices: Summary of safety monitoring results.

FilterWire SpiderWire

Device Type Embolic protection device Embolic protection device
Manufacturer Boston Scientific ev3Inc
Surveillance dates 1/1/2008–12/31/2012 1/1/2008–12/31/2012
Total device exposure cases 350 452
Number of quarterly analyses 20 20
Mean exposures per study period (Quarter) 18 23
Comparator group Alternative embolic protection device, not Filterwire Alternative embolic protection device, not Spiderwire
Number of cases matched 328 352
Proportion of cases matched 93.7% 77.9%

Outcomes monitored In Hospital Death Post procedure myocardial infarction (MI) Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) In Hospital Death Post procedure myocardial infarction (MI) Major adverse cardiac events (MACE)

Observed Event Rate %
(within propensity matched cohort)
2.13% 4.88% 6.40% 0.57% 4.83% 5.40%
Relative risk (95% CI) 2.33 (0.61–8.95) 1.00 (0.51–1.97) 1.00 (0.56–1.80) 0.25 (0.05–1.17) 0.89 (.47–1.69) 0.73 (0.41–1.30)
Safety Alerts Triggered None None None None None None
Time to first safety alert NAa NAa NAa NAa NAa NAa

Abbreviations: CI, Confidence Interval

a

No repeated or sustained safety signal generated during the study