Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Decis Making. 2016 Jul 18;37(1):70–78. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16660547

Table 4.

Factors Associated with Physicians’ Support for Shared Decision Making: Adjusted Logistic Regression Results1

Odds Ratio 95% CI

Screening Context

USPSTF Evidence Grade
A 1.00
B 0.74 0.61, 0.91
C 0.76 0.58, 0.99
D 0.63 0.48, 0.83
I 0.72 0.57, 0.91

Decision not to screen elders 0.45 0.36, 0.56

Physician

Age 0.99 0.98, 1.01

Race
White 1.00
Asian 1.05 0.67, 1.64
Other 0.85 0.52, 1.39

Male 1.00
Female 1.27 0.90, 1.77

Specialty
Family medicine 1.00
General internal medicine/other 1.02 0.74,1.39

No university affiliation 1.00
University affiliation 0.92 0.67, 1.27

Motivation for shared decision making (SDM)
Benefits of SDM (intrinsic) 2.29 1.87, 2.79
External pressure (extrinsic) 0.94 0.84, 1.05

Practice size
Solo/partner 1.00
Small group 0.87 0.59, 1.29
Large group 0.88 0.59, 1.33
1

Interclass correlation coefficient = 0.33.

USPSTF, United States Preventive Services Task Force.