TABLE 2.
Epidemiologic and Intervention Effect Inputs | Base Value | Range | Source | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Distribution of cohort by selected CD4 categories | |||||
<250 cells/µL | 0.40 | 0.20–0.50 | Trial data | ||
<350 cells/µL | 0.60 | 0.40–0.70 | |||
<500 cells/µL | 0.80 | 0.60–0.90 | |||
Base Value Below CD4 Threshold* |
Range |
Base Value Above CD4 Threshold* |
Range | Sources | |
TB disease prevalence at baseline | |||||
CD4 250 cells/µL | 0.11 | 0.05–0.16 | 0.05 | 0.02–0.07 | 3,29,45 |
CD4 350 cells/µL | 0.10 | 0.05–0.15 | 0.03 | 0.02–0.05 | 3,29,45 |
CD4 500 cells/µL | 0.09 | 0.04–0.13 | 0.01 | 0.00–0.02 | 3,29,45 |
TB screening† | |||||
Proportion correctly identified with TB disease at baseline |
|||||
CD4 250 cells/µL | 0.96 | 0.79–0.98 | 0.83 | 0.63–0.95 | Imputed from45 |
CD4 350 cells/µL | 0.95 | 0.78–0.97 | 0.80 | 0.65–0.94 | |
CD4 500 cells/µL | 0.90 | 0.73–0.92 | 0.75 | 0.60–0.85 | |
Proportion not requiring anti-TB treatment at baseline | |||||
CD4 250 cells/µL | 0.98 | 0.80–1.00 | 0.99 | 0.80–1.00 | Assumption |
CD4 350 cells/µL | 0.98 | 0.80–1.00 | 0.99 | 0.80–1.00 | |
CD4 500 cells/µL | 0.99 | 0.80–1.00 | 1.00 | 0.80–1.00 | |
TST positivity | |||||
CD4 250 cells/µL | |||||
Proportion TST-positive with active TB | 0.52 | 0.42–0.62 | 0.73 | 0.59–0.87 | 31,33 |
Proportion TST-positive without active TB | 0.17 | 0.15–0.23 | 0.30 | 0.24–0.36 | 13,14,16,32,34 |
TB incidence rates‡ | |||||
CD4 200 cells/µL | |||||
TST-positive PLHIV | 0.18 | 0.07–0.49 | 0.03 | 0.02–0.05 | Trial data |
TST-negative PLHIV | 0.03 | 0.01–0.08 | 0.01 | 0.01–0.02 | |
PLHIV (TST status unknown) | 0.07 | 0.03–0.18 | 0.02 | 0.01–0.03 | |
Mortality rates‡ | |||||
CD4 200 cells/µL, TB-negative PLHIV | |||||
TST-positive | 0.05 | 0.01–0.36 | 0.02 | 0.01–0.04 | Trial data |
TST-negative | 0.05 | 0.02–0.12 | 0.01 | 0.00–0.02 | |
TST status unknown | 0.05 | 0.02–0.18 | 0.01 | 0.01–0.02 | |
Base Value on ART |
Range |
Base Value Not on ART |
Range | Sources | |
Mortality rates∥ | |||||
TB-positive PLHIV | |||||
Prevalent cases identified at baseline | 0.05 | 0.01–0.20 | 0.15 | 0.05–0.30 | 46–48 |
Incorrectly classified for active TB at baseline | |||||
False negatives—IPT/delayed TB treatment | 0.27 | 0.05–0.35 | 0.35 | 0.10–0.40 | Supplementary§ Digital Content |
False negatives—No IPT/delayed TB treatment | 0.27 | 0.05–0.35 | 0.35 | 0.10–0.40 | Supplementary§ Digital Content |
False positives—TB treatment | 0.02 | 0.01–0.15 | 0.01 | 0.00–0.10 | 49–53 |
Base Value Below CD4 Threshold* |
Range |
Base Value Above CD4 Threshold* |
Range | Source | |
Reduction in TB incidence due to ART initiation at higher CD4 compared to threshold CD4 200 cells/µL‡ |
|||||
CD4 250 cells/µL | 0.21 | 0.04–0.32 | 0.20 | 0.04–0.30 | 1,54 |
CD4 350 cells/µL | 0.26 | 0.05–0.38 | 0.50 | 0.10–0.75 | 1,14,54–59 |
CD4 500 cells/µL | 0.35 | 0.07–0.52 | 0.65 | 0.13–0.97 | 1,54,56,57,60 |
Reduction in mortality due to ART initiation at higher | |||||
CD4 compared to threshold CD4 200 cells/µL‡ | |||||
CD4 250 cells/µL | 0.22 | 0.04–0.34 | 0.18 | 0.04–0.27 | 53,61 |
CD4 350 cells/µL | 0.28 | 0.06–0.41 | 0.54 | 0.11–0.81 | 49–51,53,61 |
CD4 500 cells/µL | 0.44 | 0.09–0.66 | 0.71 | 0.14–1.07 | 53,61 |
Reduction in TB incidence after provision of ART‡ | |||||
CD4 250 cells/µL | 0.59 | 0.12–0.86 | — | — | Supplementary§ Digital Content |
CD4 350 cells/µL | 0.56 | 0.13–0.88 | — | — | |
CD4 500 cells/µL | 0.49 | 0.10–0.74 | — | — | |
Reduction in mortality after provision of ART‡ | |||||
CD4 250 cells/µL | 0.62 | 0.12–0.93 | — | — | Supplementary§ Digital Content |
CD4 350 cells/µL | 0.58 | 0.15–0.87 | — | — | |
CD4 500 cells/µL | 0.45 | 0.09–0.68 | — | — | |
Reduction (increase) in TB incidence after provision of IPT‡ |
|||||
CD4 200 cells/µL, 6-mo course | |||||
TST-positive | 0.21 | 0.00–0.30 | 0.21 | 0.00–0.30 | Trial data |
TST-negative | 0.05 | 0.00–0.10 | 0.05 | 0.00–0.10 | Trial data |
TST status unknown | 0.16 | 0.00–0.20 | 0.12 | 0.00–0.20 | Trial data |
CD4 200 cells/µL, 36-mo course | |||||
TST-positive | 0.77 | 0.39–0.91 | 0.88 | 0.74–0.95 | Trial data |
TST-negative | 0.31 | 0.58–0.10 | 0.30 | 0.23–0.35 | Trial data |
TST status unknown | 0.41 | 0.23–0.42 | 0.56 | 0.47–0.61 | Trial data |
Reduction (increase) in mortality after provision of IPT‡ | |||||
CD4 200 cells/µL, 6-mo course | |||||
TST-positive | 0.09 | 0.00–0.15 | 0.09 | 0.00–0.15 | Trial data |
TST-negative | 0.00 | 0.00–0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00–0.00 | Trial data |
TST status unknown | 0.02 | 0.01–0.04 | 0.04 | 0.00–0.10 | Trial data |
CD4 200 cells/µL, 36-mo course | |||||
TST-positive | 0.06 | 0.10–0.00 | 0.77 | 0.63–0.87 | Trial data |
TST-negative | 0.71 | 1.08–0.38 | 0.47 | 0.64–0.34 | Trial data |
TST status unknown | 0.56 | 0.99–0.22 | 0.13 | 0.08–0.20 | Trial data |
Cost Inputs∥ | Base Value | Range | Source | ||
Annual ART | |||||
Clinical care and laboratory services | 371 | 186–557 | 25 | ||
Antiretroviral drugs | 230 | 115–345 | 62 | ||
Total ART | 601 | 301–902 | |||
TB treatment | |||||
Pharmacist observation (10 minutes daily) | 322 | — | 27 | ||
Standard 182 d DOTS treatment | 10 | — | 27 | ||
Total TB treatment | 332 | 166–498 | 27 | ||
IPT | |||||
Nurse time (15 min per visit) | 2.66 | — | 27 | ||
Isoniazid per month | 0.50 | — | 27 | ||
Pyridoxine (B6) per month | 0.17 | — | 27 | ||
Total 6-mo IPT | 20 | 10–29 | |||
Total 36-mo IPT | 117 | 59–176 | |||
TST | |||||
Protein purified derivative per dose | 6.50 | — | 12 | ||
Nurse time and medical supplies | 4.60 | — | Trial data | ||
Required infrastructure investments per person | 2.03 | — | 36 | ||
Total TST | 13 | 7–20 | |||
Hospitalization | |||||
Inpatient cost per day | 190 | — | 36 | ||
Total hospitalization for TB (21 d) | 3999 | 1999–5998 | |||
Total hospitalization for IPT toxicity (10 d) | 1904 | 952–2856 |
TB disease prevalence at baseline CD4 250 cells/µL, CD4 350 cells/µL, and CD4 500 cells/µL.
PLHIV below the specified threshold were assumed to also receive ART; PLHIV above the specified threshold did not receive ART over the period.
Data imputed for CD4 <250 and CD4 <500.
Calculated using intent-to-treat trial data and estimates from the published literature. All values presented are per annum; rate reductions averaged over 36 months.
Detailed derivation of these estimates can be found in the Supplementary Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/QAI/A727.
All costs are reported per patient and have been inflated to 2010 US dollars using the Medical Care Consumer Price Index provided by the US census bureau.